Feb 242013
 

This article will explain how to make your own negative pressure (vacuum) projection liner for geodesic domes, for a reasonable price and of professional quality. It is inspired by a patent filed more than 35 years ago.

 

Our example

First: in this example we are looking to produce a projection liner for a 15 meter (50-foot) diameter geodesic dome, the materials will be the same used by professional projection liner manufacturers. The main component of your liner is the vinyl:

  • Because there is waste when cutting sections, let’s round the total to 400 linear yards of fire-retardant vinyl
  • 2-layer projection liner 400 linear yards X $20 = $8,000 of vinyl material

Next is the frame holding up the projection liner.

 

The Frame

The other component to this projection liner is the frame to hold up the projection liner. Look at the images below:

projection_patent_fig3

projection_patent_fig2

 

The frame is slightly smaller than the geodesic dome. Its sections slide one into the other, just like top rails on a fence or electrical or plumbing conduit. To curve the metal to mimic the shape of the dome, a little math is required, but basically almost any metal shop can bend the pipe, and quickly. The end result is an easy-to-assemble frame.

A fairly generous estimate for the cost of a frame to hold up the projection liner is approximately $5000. Actually it’s a high estimate and almost any pipe can be used since it will never show (it’s between the two vinyl layers.

 

How you end up with up a very nice projection surface

The principle is simple: the outer layer is sealed to the inner layer and the metal frame holds up both layers. Connector an air pump to an opening and turn it on to create a suction.

You need only one location to suck the air out evenly because the negative pressure (vacuum) will equalize itself all over.

IMPORTANT: if you use vinyl which weighs 16 oz  per square yard, , this means your liner will weigh hundreds of pounds/kilograms. In our example, a single layer of vinyl is 4000 square feet, and we need two layers, for a total of 8000 square feet. At 18 ounces per square yard, the liner will weigh 900 pounds or more than 400 kilograms.

projection_patent_fig4

When air is suctioned out between the two layers, the inner layers forms a natural dome shape. An important note is how the frame is assembled, then the projection liner is thrown ovet the frame, and for a final touch, both layers are sealed at the the base.

Here is your current total (retail):

  • $8000 for fabric
  • $5000 for the frame

The next cost is making the 2 liner shapes.

You need to create two  half spheres (like an umbrella). the bigger one for the outer layer, the smaller one for the interior layer, the one on which you project. Vinyl is heat welded. If you don’t know where to go, try truck tarp makers; they heat weld vinyl on a daily basis.

It should not take more than 3 days of work to assemble the sections together. But if you do not pre-cut the sections yourself, expect 4 days of shop work, 8 hours per day, $80/hour.

Your current total is now:

  • $8000 for fabric
  • $5000 for the frame
  • $3000 for heat welding of vinyl sections (rounded higher)

Add the cost for a blower/ pump: $300. Your total is under $17,000

So, let’s propose an extreme situation: let’s say our final cost is actually $10,000 more than estimated. Your investment is now $27,000. Keep in mind we are using retail pricing for all components.

Dome manufacturers will sell you a 15 meter (50 foot), 3-layer version for a reasonable… $65,000, plus shipping, plus a team to set it up.

That’s almost 2.5 times more than our DIY estimate for a comparable product. Even if you add a third layer to our DIY solution, it remains around twice the price of what a dome manufacturer offers. And this also includes that extra $10,000 we added for fun. But let’s be fair: companies need to make a profit, though it seems quite expensive to purchase one. And you still need a team to install and take off the liner.

 

Be Sociable, Share!
Feb 042013
 

Many geodesic event domes suppliers love to sell you on incredibly expensive event solutions. In a niche business it is expected to be expensive, and it almost always is.

But the ultimate waste of money promoted by event dome sellers is the  the negative vacuum/pressure projection system.

Those event dome suppliers who will suggest a negative-pressure projection system, a fancy expression for an system holding the projection fabric in place via a vacuum effect, are not offering you the best option for your event.

Many years ago dome sellers started using this patented method, and for a lack of options or most likely laziness,  continue to offer it. But it is not the best one out there.  A negative pressure/vacuum system is a pretty good solution for smaller domes, but anything bigger than 35 feet (11 meters) is not smart.

And even then, it’s pushing the boundaries of common financial sense. A negative pressure projection liner does do its job, but the majority of sellers demand an unrealistic amount. Why? Because they are very much aware that the liner they rent out may stay in storage a long time until is is used again, and so it is very likely the rental amount is same or more than purchasing the item.

pureblondeinside

In the image  above, projection is displayed on a geodesic event dome’s cover, something that may not be acceptable to clients. The alternative is to use multiple layers of fabric for a smooth, rounded projection surface and to hide the geodesic structure.

 

Why the negative pressure/vacuum projection system sucks

It consists of  three layers of PVC or similar material. You plug in the air blower which creates a vacuum between two layers and the result is a nice rounded shape. If a power outage occurs, your projection surface surface comes down. For outside use, a power backup source can be installed to immediately compensate, but if your dome is located inside and your backup is a generator,  it will be very noisy.

The greatest criticism about the negative pressure/vacuum projection system is the cost. A typical solution using this system for a complete 36-foot (11meter) diameter dome will easily set you back $40,000, and this is before shipping, taxes, installation and other related costs. If you would like to see more pictures of the negative pressure/vacuum system, visit the St-Lawrence Hall of Science planetarium website.

 Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Many dome sellers are snobs

If you mention inflatable domes to a metal conduit dome seller they will have a prepared list of criticism regarding them. In addition, they know very little about inflatable domes other than they require air to be set up. Why?

  • Inflatables are the products that can compete with metal domes.
  • Most inflatable domes are manufactured in Asia, and so costs tend to be much lower than metallic domes. Also, geodesic covers are much less expensive.
  • Inflatable domes do not require as much technical expertise and equipment to set up, and this cuts into the metal event dome seller’s profit margin.

Inflatable domes are far from perfect:

  • If the power goes out the structure deflates
  • It requires a very firm attachment to the ground
  • Not all inflatable have nice rounded shapes for good projection results.

These issues are not difficult to address, though traditional event dome sellers will repeat them continuously because it is their natural competitor. The solution for the client or end user is a hybrid one.

 

So what is the alternative?

In short: consider a traditional inflatable projection dome inside a traditional geodesic structure. These are inflated like a giant balloon, and their interior surface is often designed for projection.

Stay away from inflatables which inflate the inside of the dome to stay up (ex: soccer domes). The right choice is a dome which inflates its wall to remain upright. This way there is no need to keep the dome sealed at all times.

If you opt for the inflatable projection solution, be aware there are varying degrees of quality and construction; for example, one inflatable may have a much smoother surface than another.

 

A variation on the negative pressure concept is available by clicking on the banner below:

diy_projection_liner_banner

 

Two solution: one sucks and the other blows?

The difference is a lot of money, and we mean a lot of valuable money. Expect an inflatable dome to be less than half  the cost of the negative pressure/vacuum system (most suppliers are sourced from Asia). To secure the inflatable dome, put it inside a geodesic dome structure. Funny thing: that is exactly what is done for negative pressure systems. but at a much higher cost.

Not only will you save large amounts of money, but it would be easy to store the inflatable dome for future events. If you believe negative projection liners are the best fit for you, consider clicking on the banner above for a solution about half the price of what dome sellers offer.

 

 

Be Sociable, Share!
Jan 212013
 

2500-free-plans

 

We just made an addition to Domerama.

This collection offers more than 2500 plans in PDF format that you can download. These are all in the public domain.

These are what some call conceptual plans, a page or two long. Most will have all the necessary information to build your project, from trusses to aviaries, barns, fences and cattle buildings to name just a very few. Some are from the 1930′s all the way to a few years ago.

Click here or on the image above to view the plans section

 

Be Sociable, Share!
Jan 192013
 

World dietary habits have not improved in the last century. In fact, our health has given into bad habits of all kinds, and it’s not just junk food or fast food: it’s in everything we eat now. You either educate yourself and do something about it, or keep believing the crap from advertisers ( if you trust big business, look at the content of homemade yogurt and then look at the traditional version in supermarkets).

If you need convincing about the benefits in growing your own food, watch the video below.

Mark Bittman: What's wrong with what we eat

Be Sociable, Share!
Jan 192013
 

Bucky was not an architect, nor an engineer, and actually explains his patent for geodesic geometry.

TC Howard was one of several talented architects who were overshadowed by Bucky.  Shoji Sadao was Bucky’s partner who designed the 67 Montreal Expo Pavilion with Geometrics, Inc.  All of the Geometrics, Inc architects, Don Richter for Kaiser domes and Temcor  and Jeffrey Lindsay.  TC Howard is synonymous with Synergetics, Inc.

Montreal Expo 67 U.S. pavillion

Montreal Expo 67 U.S. pavillion

There is an over-abundance  of architectural firms, and it took a flamboyant person like Bucky to grab the attention and get the commissions.  Bucky was well known and had great connections, and originally pioneered the idea to make prefabricated housing to bring  down the price of owning a home.

He was not interested in building larger domes.  TC never designed houses.  TC helped prove that the larger the geodesic dome the stronger it became.  Bucky did not want to be in the dome building business.  Kaiser aluminum saw the dome industry as a new use for supplying aluminum.

Union Tank Car Dome

Union Tank Car Dome

Union Tank Car foresaw the potential also:  they bought the rights to the UTC dome plans and were going to start manufacturing more.  North American Aviation saw the decline of air crafts and also wanted to expand into the dome business:  ASM dome and the Climatron.

Climatron Missouri Botanical Gardens

Climatron Missouri Botanical Gardens

For more on TC Howard, click here.

Be Sociable, Share!